Electrophoresis refers to the movement of charged particles under a uniform electric field, which is dependent on the charge and size of a sample. It is a popular technique used often for DNA and RNA molecules. During electrophoresis, the particle is driven towards either cathode (+) or anode (-) due to the charged interface between particle surface and surrounding fluid.
As for gel electrophoresis, electric field facilitates the movement of the particle through the gel. Because how fast a molecule move is proportional to its size, smaller molecules move faster and travel further than larger ones. In addition, the mobility of the sample could be inferred based on the distance it travelled.
Though Gel electrophoresis can be performed using either agarose or polyacrylamide, the latter has a greater resolving power.
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) is a technique applied for imaging with a very high resolution. Its working principle is based on the force measurement using a cantilever with a sharp probe while scanning the sample surface. As the tip of probe moves up and down with respect to surface, gathered information could be utilized to acquire 3D image of the sample surface (topography). The imaging result is usually displayed as a pseudocolor plot.
In contrast to Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) that could only image conducting or semi-conducting surfaces, AFM overcomes this drawback as almost any type of surface imaging could be achieved. Two other advantages of AFM are no vacuum or pre-treatment required for imaging.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, also sometimes conventional transmission electron microscopy or CTEM) is a microscopy technique in which a beam of electrons is transmitted through a specimen to form an image. The specimen is most often an ultrathin section less than 100 nm thick or a suspension on a grid. An image is formed from the interaction of the electrons with the sample as the beam is transmitted through the specimen. The image is then magnified and focused onto an imaging device, such as a fluorescent screen, a layer of photographic film, or a sensor such as a charge-coupled device.
Transmission electron microscopes are capable of imaging at a significantly higher resolution than light microscopes, owing to the smaller de Broglie wavelength of electrons. This enables the instrument to capture fine detail-even as small as a single column of atoms, which is thousands of times smaller than a resolvable object seen in a light microscope. Transmission electron microscopy is a major analytical method in the physical, chemical and biological sciences. TEMs find application in cancer research, virology, and materials science as well as pollution, nanotechnology and semiconductor research.
First, we prepared the samples ①-⑤ for annealing by the following procedures.
10 nM DNA Origami samples were prepared by mixing 180 staple-strands with M13 (7249 nt).
50 µL of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 20 µL of 10 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), were also prepared for each solution.
For Experiment 1, to examine the optimal Mg2+ concentration, MgCl2 buffer for samples ①-⑤ were adjusted to ①10 mM, ②12.5 mM , ③ 15 mM, ④ 17.5 mM, ⑤ 20 mM as a gradient.
The final concentration of samples ①-⑤ for annealing are shown in Table 1 below.
Sample | ① | ② | ③ | ④ | ⑤ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M13 | 10 nM | 10 nM | 10 nM | 10 nM | 10 nM |
staples | 50 nM | 50 nM | 50 nM | 50 nM | 50 nM |
Mg2+ | 10 mM | 12.5 mM | 15 mM | 17.5 mM | 20 mM |
DNA samples were annealed according to the protocol below. Annealed samples were obtained after about 16 hours.
\begin{align}
&85℃ \xrightarrow{5 \ min} 65℃ \xrightarrow{15 \ min} 60℃ \xrightarrow{-1℃/1hr.} 44℃ \xrightarrow{automatic} 25℃
\end{align}
Then, electrophoresis was performed to check the annealed samples.
The samples for electrophoresis were prepared as Table 2 shows below.
annealed Sample | annealed ① | annealed ② | annealed ③ | annealed ④ | annealed ⑤ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M13 | 1 nM | 1 nM | 1 nM | 1 nM | 1 nM |
Staples | 5 nM | 5 nM | 5 nM | 5 nM | 5 nM |
Mg2+buffer | 10 mM | 12.5 mM | 15 mM | 17.5 mM | 20 mM |
loading buffer | 1x | 1x | 1x | 1x | 1x |
Electrophoresis was performed as follows.
We prepared 1% agarose gel and performed gel electrophoresis following the standard procedures below.
We prepared samples ①-⑮ for annealing by the following procedures.
DNA Origami samples ①-⑮ were prepared by annealing different amounts of Lock DNA strands with 50 nM 180 staple-strands and 10 nM M13 (7249 nt).
50 µL of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and 20 µL of 10 mM EDTA (pH 8.0) were also prepared for each solution.
To examine the optimal amount of lock DNA strands to close the Open-state unit, the strand-amount gradient was set up as seen in the following Table 3. (See Design for Lock Position)
Sample Name | Number of Locks | Lock Position | Note |
---|---|---|---|
1 | N=1 | L10 | |
2 | N=2 | L10, L15 | |
3A | N=3 | L2, L10, L13 | one each on left, middle and right sides |
3B | N=4 | L8, L9, L11 | three in the middle |
4 | N=4 | L8, L9, L10, L11 | |
5 | N=5 | L1, L2, L3, L4, L5 | five on left side |
5R | N=5 | L12, L13, L14, L15, L16 | five on right side |
6 | N=6 | L2, L4, L8, L10, L13, L15 | |
9 | N=9 | L2, L3, L4, L8, L9, L10, L13, L14, L15 | |
12 | N=12 | L2, L3, L4, L5, L8, L9, L10, L13, L14, L15, L16 | |
14 | N=14 | L1, L2, L3 L4 L5 L8, L9, L10, L11, L12, L13, L14, L15, L16 | |
16 | N=16 | L1, L2, L3, L4, L5, L6, L7, L8, L9, L10, L11, L12, L13, L14, L15, L16 | |
Unit | N=0 | Open state unit without Lock DNA strand |
Annealing samples were prepared according to Table 4 below.
Reagent | Final Concentration |
---|---|
M13 | 10 nM |
Staple | 50 nM |
Lock Staple | 50 nM |
Buffer | 1x |
DNA samples were were annealed according to the protocol below.
Annealed samples were obtained after about 16 hours.
\begin{align}
&85℃ \xrightarrow{5 \ min} 65℃ \xrightarrow{15 \ min} 60℃ \xrightarrow{-1℃/1hr.} 44℃ \xrightarrow{automatic} 25℃
\end{align}
Then, electrophoresis was performed to check the annealed samples.
Gel electrophoresis was performed as follows.
We prepared 0.8% agarose gel and performed gel electrophoresis following the standard procedures below.
For the experiments to confirm the DNA Strand mechanism, Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed according to the protocol below.
We prepared 10% polyacrylamide gel and performed gel electrophoresis following the standard procedures below.
Latch X + Latch Y: Close
Concentration ratio | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
sample | ① 1:1 | ② 1:1.2 | ③ 1:1.4 | ④ 1:1.6 | ⑤ 1:1.8 | ⑥ 1:2.0 | ⑦ 1:2.5 |
latch XY / μM | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
close DNA / μM | 1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.5 |
MgCl2 / mM | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
Samples ①-⑦ were incubated for 30 mins, in 25 ℃.
After incubation, Samples ①-⑦ were mixed with 1×loading buffer, 12.5 mM MgCl2 buffer, and mQ for the electrophoresis. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed later (100 V, 80 mins, 4 ℃).
Latch X,Y:Close:Anti-Close
Concentration ratio | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample | ① 1:1 | ② 1:1.2 | ③ 1:1.4 | ④ 1:1.6 | ⑤ 1:1.8 | ⑥ 1:2.0 | ⑦ 1:2.2 | ⑧ 1:2.4 |
Latch X, Y / μM | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Close / μM | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Anti-close / μM | 1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.4 |
MgCl2 / mM | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
Samples ①-⑧ were incubated for 30 mins, in 25 ℃.
After incubation, Samples ①-⑧ were mixed with 1×loading buffer, 12.5 mM MgCl2 buffer, and mQ for the electrophoresis. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed later (100 V, 80 mins, 4 ℃).
Bridge:Open
Concentration ratio | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample | ① 1:1 | ② 1:1.2 | ③ 1:1.4 | ④ 1:1.6 | ⑤ 1:1.8 | ⑥ 1:2.0 | ⑦ 1:2.5 |
Bridge / μM | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Open / μM | 1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.5 |
MgCl2 buffer / mM | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
Samples ①-⑦ were incubated for 30 mins, in 25 ℃.
After incubation, Samples ①-⑦ were mixed with 1×loading buffer, 12.5 mM MgCl2 buffer, and mQ for the electrophoresis. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed later (100 V, 80 mins, 4 ℃).
Bridge:Open:Anti-Open
Concentration ratio | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample | ① 1:1 | ② 1:1.2 | ③ 1:1.4 | ④ 1:1.6 | ⑤ 1:1.8 | ⑥ 1:2.0 | ⑦ 1:2.2 | ⑧ 1:2.4 |
Bridge / μM | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Open / μM | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | |
Anti-Open / μM | 1 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.4 | |
MgCl2 buffer / mM | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
Samples ①-⑧ were incubated for 30 mins, in 25 ℃.
After incubation, Samples ①-⑧ were mixed with 1×loading buffer, 12.5 mM MgCl2 buffer, and mQ for the electrophoresis. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed later (100 V, 80 mins, 4 ℃).
Sample combinations of DNA strands for integrated experiments are shown in Table 9 below.
① | ② | ③ | ④ | ⑤ | ⑥ | ⑦ | ⑧ | ⑨ | |
Latch X, Y / μM | 1 | 1 | |||||||
Close / μM | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Anti-close / μM | 1 | 1 | |||||||
Bridge / μM | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Open / μM | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Anti-Open / μM | 1 | 1 | 1 |
(The concentration ratio of Latch X, Y : Close : Anti-Close = 1:1.2:2, and Bridge:Open:Anti-Open=1:1.4:1.8)
After incubation, Sample ①-⑩ were mixed with 1×loading buffer, 12.5 mM MgCl2 buffer, and mQ for the later polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (100 V, 80 mins, 4 ℃).
2.25 μL 400 nM M13 solution, 24.3 μL 185 nM staples solution, 0.27 μL 5000 nM Bridge solution, 3 μL 125 mM MgCl2 buffer and mQ were mixed to make annealing mixture. Annealing mixture was annealed following the protocol below. Annealed mixture was obtained after 16 hrs. \begin{align} &85℃ \xrightarrow{5 \ min} 65℃ \xrightarrow{15 \ min} 60℃ \xrightarrow{-1℃/1hour} 44℃ \xrightarrow{automatic} 25℃ \end{align}
After annealing, Amico pro purification was performed by the following procedures.
Later, to check the yield by purification, Agarose gel electrophoresis was performed as follows.
First, we prepared the Samples ①-⑦ for annealing by the following procedures.
25 nM unit-left submixture and 25 nM unit-right submixture were prepared for the annealing of dimers.
To examine the optimal linker DNA strand concentration, Linker concentration for Samples ①-⑦ were adjusted to ①10 nM, ②15 nM, ③20 nM, ④25 nM, ⑤30 nM, ⑥35 nM, ⑦40 nM each as a gradient.
The final concentration of Samples ①-⑦ for annealing are shown in Table 10 below.
Sample | ① | ② | ③ | ④ | ⑤ | ⑥ | ⑦ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit-left / nM | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Unit-right / nM | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Linker / nM | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 40 |
MgCl2 buffer / nM | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
The sample was annealed following the protocol below. Annealed mixture was obtained after 150 mins. \begin{align} &40℃(1 \ min \ hold) \xrightarrow 25℃ (-0.1℃/1 \ min) \end{align} After annealing, Samples ①-⑦ were mixed with 1×loading buffer, 12.5 mM MgCl2 buffer, and mQ for the later electrophoresis. Agarose gel electrophoresis was performed later (100 V, 50 mins, 4 ℃).
To examine confirm the strand mechanisms for the integrated system and confirm the optimal concentration for hybridization between Actuator+Close with Signal and Actuator+Close with Anti-signal, we designed two experiments for Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Actuator+Close:Signal
Concentration ratio | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample | ① 1:1 | ② 1:1.2 | ③ 1:1.5 | ④ 1:2.0 | ⑤ 1:2.2 | ⑥ 1:2.5 | |
Actuator / μM | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Close / μM | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Signal / μM | 1 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.5 | |
MgCl2 buffer / mM | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
Samples ②-⑦ were incubated for 30 mins, in 25 ℃.
After incubation, Samples ①-⑦ were mixed with 1× loading buffer, 12.5 mM MgCl2 buffer, and mQ for the later electrophoresis. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed later (100 V, 80 mins, 4 ℃).
Actuator + Close + Signal + Anti-Signal
Concentration ratio | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample | ① | ② | ③ | ④ | ⑤ | ⑥ | ⑦ | ⑧ |
Actuator / μM | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Close / μM | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Signal / μM | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Anti-Signal / μM | 0 | 1.2 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | 3.5 | 4 | 4.5 |
MgCl2 buffer / mM | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
Sample ②-⑧ were incubated for 30 mins, in 25 ℃. After incubation, Samples ①-⑧ were mixed with 1×loading buffer, 12.5 mM MgCl2 buffer, and mQ for the later electrophoresis. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed later (100 V, 80 mins, 4 ℃).
We prepared the annealing Samples ⑥ and ⑦ by standard procedures as follows.
Sample ⑥ was prepared and annealed by mixing 7 µL of Sample ② annealed in Experiment 1 with 2 µL of 500 nM actuator-DNA, 2 µL of 500 nM close-DNA, 2 µL of 12.5 nM of MgCl2 buffer and 7 µL of mQ.
Sample ⑦ was prepared and annealed by mixing 7 µL of Sample ② annealed in Experiment 1, with 2 µL of 12.5 mM MgCl2 buffer and 11 µL of mQ.
Final annealing concentrations for Samples ⑥ and Samples ⑦ are shown in Table 13 below.
Sample ⑥ (with actuator-DNA + close-DNA) |
Sample ⑦ (without actuator-DNA + close-DNA) |
|
M13 | 10 nM | 10 nM |
Staple | 50 nM | 50 nM |
Actuator | 50 nM | 0 nM |
Close | 50 nM | 0 nM |
Buffer | 1 × | 1 × |
For electrophoresis, 1 µL of each annealed Sample ⑥ and Sample ⑦ were mixed with 1 µL of 12.5 mM MgCl2 buffer, 1 µL of 10×Loading buffer and 7 µL of mQ.
Final electrophoresis concentrations for Samples ⑥ and Samples ⑦ are shown in Table 14 below.
Reagent | Concentration | |
---|---|---|
Sample ⑥ (actuator-DNA + close-DNA) |
Sample ⑦ (actuator-DNA + close-DNA) |
|
M13 scaffold | 10 nM | 10 nM |
Staple | 50 nM | 50 nM |
actuator-DNA | 50 nM | 0 nM |
close-DNA | 50 nM | 0 nM |
Loading buffer | 1 × | 1 × |
Buffer(Mg2+ 12.5mM) | 1 × | 1 × |
Samples ⑥ and ⑦, along with 1× ladder solution and 1 nM M13 solution were prepared and added to the wells. Gel electrophoresis was performed and structures were observed.
According to results of Main Experiment 1.1., we selected Sample ② and diluted it 10 times by 12.5 mM MgCl2 buffer for AFM observation.
Since the sample was overly diluted in Main Experiment 1.2, we were only able to observe several structures by AFM. Thus, for Experiment Ⅳ, we diluted the samples 5 times instead of 10 times by 12.5mM MgCl2 buffer for AFM observation.
According to results of Experiment 3, we selected Sample ①, ④, ⑤, ⑫ for TEM observation. 5 μL of each sample was rinsed by 20 μL 0.2% Phosphotungstic acid-0.5N NaOH (pH = 7.3) and 60 μL 12.5 mM MgCl2 buffer.
According to results of Supplementary Experiment 4, 5 μL of purified mixture was rinsed by 20 μL 0.2% Phosphotungstic acid-0.5N NaOH (pH = 7.3) and 60 μL 12.5 mM MgCl2 buffer.
According to results of Main Experiment 5.1, 5 μL of Sample ② was rinsed by 20 μL 0.2% Phosphotungstic acid-0.5N NaOH (pH = 7.3) and 60 μL 12.5 mM MgCl2 buffer.
Closed state
Fig.1 TEM image of a closed unit
Load the TEM images into image J, and set the scale to 2048 pixels/808.09 nm = 2.5344 (pixels/nm). Set the threshold so that it is possible to differentiate between the background and the outline of the target. The Upper length and Lower Length are measured as shown in Fig.2 below.
Fig.2 How to measure the lengths of a closed unit
Open state
Fig.3 TEM image of an open unit
Load the TEM images into image J, and set the scale to 2048 pixels/808.09 nm = 2.5344 (pixels/nm). Set the threshold so that it is possible to differentiate between the background and the outline of the target. The Minor length and Major Length are measured as shown in Fig.4 below
Fig.4 How to measure the lengths of an open unit
About 20 TEM images were measured, and Average, Minimum, Maximum, and Standard deviation were calculated.
Each materials were purchased from companies below.
Materials | Company |
---|---|
M13mp18 | TAKARA , JAPAN |
Agarose | TAKARA,JAPAN |
SYBR gold | Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA |
MgCl2・6H2O | Wako Pure Chemical Industries, JAPAN |
10×loading buffer | TAKARA , JAPAN |
20 bp Ladder | TAKARA , JAPAN |
100 bp Ladder | Bristol-Myers Squibb, USA |
1 kbp Ladder | NIPPON GENE, JAPAN |
EDTA | Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA |
Tris-HCl | NIPPON GENE, JAPAN |
5×TBE | NIPPON GENE, JAPAN |
TEMED | BIO-RAD, USA |
DNA strands | DNA strands Eurofins Genomics, JAPAN Integreted DNA technologies, USA |
Each equipment was purchased from companies below.
Equipments | Company |
---|---|
ChemiDoc MP (gel imager) | BIO-RAD, USA |
Mastercycler pernonal (thermal cycler) | Eppendorf, USA |
BIoSpec-nano | SHIMADZU CORPORATION, JAPAN |
Mupid-exU | TAKARA, JAPAN |
Mild Mixer SL-36 | TAITEC, JAPAN |
Zetasizer Nano ZSP | Malvern, UK |
Olympus IX 81 | OLYMPUS, JAPAN |
Nano Live Vision (AFM) | RIBM, JAPAN |
Mica | Furuuchi Chemical Corporation, JAPAN |
Micro Cantilever | OLYMPUS, JAPAN |
DNA sequences(.pdf) Download >> Main >> Supplementary information